rap_sheet (![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} rap_sheet) wrote,@ 2008-10-02 05:59:00 |
|
Question for the anti-Palin folks...
If you're voting against McCain because you say you are electing Sarah Palin, and you can't vote for them because she is "too inexperienced", then why do you then turn around and vote for Obama who is definitely "too inexperienced", hangs with a known terrorist, a pastor that bashes America in vulgarities, will appoint the guy who bankrupted Freddie Mac as Treasury Secretary and saddled the taxpayer with a $700,000,000,000.00 bailout, has a veep who has been dead wrong on every foreign policy issue for the past ten years and give them both a Democrat controlled Congress with a filibuster-proof majority to ram anything down your throats whether you like the change or not? How is that PREFERABLE?
If you want an example of what you're in store for with an Obama president and a filibuster-proof majority in congress...look at Rod Blagojevich with his supermajority in the state house and tell me how well THAT has worked out for Illinois. Cause that's the change you're gonna get, whether that's the change you had in mind or not. And Obama voters who start whining will be told to shut up because they have no room to complain.
Trust me when I say shifting the country extremely hard left will be a catastrophic mistake.
If you're voting against McCain because you say you are electing Sarah Palin, and you can't vote for them because she is "too inexperienced", then why do you then turn around and vote for Obama who is definitely "too inexperienced", hangs with a known terrorist, a pastor that bashes America in vulgarities, will appoint the guy who bankrupted Freddie Mac as Treasury Secretary and saddled the taxpayer with a $700,000,000,000.00 bailout, has a veep who has been dead wrong on every foreign policy issue for the past ten years and give them both a Democrat controlled Congress with a filibuster-proof majority to ram anything down your throats whether you like the change or not? How is that PREFERABLE?
If you want an example of what you're in store for with an Obama president and a filibuster-proof majority in congress...look at Rod Blagojevich with his supermajority in the state house and tell me how well THAT has worked out for Illinois. Cause that's the change you're gonna get, whether that's the change you had in mind or not. And Obama voters who start whining will be told to shut up because they have no room to complain.
Trust me when I say shifting the country extremely hard left will be a catastrophic mistake.
